Clean Energy Under Siege: Following the Money Trail....
Click here to read or download the full document.
From the Introduction:
[W]e have seen the rise during the past two years of a concerted effort to cast doubt on the public benefits of renewable energy and efficiency that have long been accepted and reflected by strong public favorability ratings.The attacks on clean energy have come in a variety of venues. Some House Republicans took a poor decision to grant a single loan guarantee to Solyndra and used it to indict clean energy broadly as a reckless investment.
Conservative groups like Americans for Prosperity have tried to rally Tea Party activists against wind power and energy efficiency. Corporate advocacy groups such as the American Legislative Exchange Council [ALEC] have targeted state renewable-electricity standards for repeal. Many of these entities are attacking incentives such as the highly successful renewable-energy Production Tax Credit for wind energy as an unwarranted government subsidy at the same time as they defend giveaways for oil and gas, stay silent about them, or support deceptive bills that purport to end all energy subsidies but fail to attack entrenched benefits for fossil fuels and nuclear power. Are these connected? By following the money trail and the energy interests behind it, we have to conclude that the answer is yes.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| SierraClub-CleanEnergyUnderSiege.pdf | 1.2 MB |
- Login to post comments
-

Although the Sierra Club was
Although the Sierra Club was notified of the errors in their report, they have yet to address them. In addition, neither fact checking nor communication was attempted by the Sierra Club on claims made in this report.
In response to this error-filled report , here is a short statement and brief fact check.
http://www.alec.org/fact-setting-response-to-sierr...
Caveat
Our policy is to accept 'anonymous' comments, as long as they meet the most basic standards of decency. In publishing this writer's comment, we do not imply concurrence with his/her position. We encourage a critical reading of both the Sierra Club report and the statements from ALEC in rebuttal.